<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building QCA with cmake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://duncan.mac-vicar.com/blog/archives/117/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://duncan.mac-vicar.com/blog/archives/117</link>
	<description>homepage</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: duncan</title>
		<link>http://duncan.mac-vicar.com/blog/archives/117#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duncan.mac-vicar.com/blog/archives/117#comment-831</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sure, actually the cmake support exists only as a patch right now.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, actually the cmake support exists only as a patch right now.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://duncan.mac-vicar.com/blog/archives/117#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duncan.mac-vicar.com/blog/archives/117#comment-819</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So will the current qconf stuff be supported? or will that fall by the side?  The reason I ask is that psi uses it&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So will the current qconf stuff be supported? or will that fall by the side?  The reason I ask is that psi uses it</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
